🌳 Do Plecos Really Eat Wood?

There’s been a long-standing debate in the aquarium hobby about whether plecos truly eat wood or simply graze on what grows on it.

---

🐟 What Plecos Really Do

• ❌ They don’t truly digest wood fibers the way once thought.
• 🍄 Instead, plecos rasp on driftwood to consume the biofilm, fungus, algae, and microorganisms living on it.
• 🌿 In aquariums, aged wood clearly grows this layer; in the wild it’s even more abundant.

---

🪵 Royal Plecos & the Xingu River

• 👑 Some Royal Plecos (Panaque sp.) live in the Xingu River (pronounced shing-GOO, not zing-GOO).
• 🌊 In some stretches, wood is scarce — not absent, but much less common than in other rivers.
• ❓ This raises the debate: Are they truly wood-dependent, or are they after the organisms growing on it?

---

💩 The Poop Evidence

• 👀 Observations show that after not feeding plecos and letting them rasp only on aged wood:
  • Their poop comes out long and brown — just as brown as the wood itself.
• ⚖️ This suggests plecos get some form of nutrition, either from:
  • ✅ The wood fibers themselves (in small amounts)
  • ✅ Or the microbial layer coating the wood
• 📚 While studies argue they can’t fully digest cellulose, hobbyist observations suggest they still benefit nutritionally.

---

🧩 Is Wood Really Necessary?

• ✅ Yes, wood is 100% fine and recommended in aquariums, since it:
  • 🍽️ Provides grazing surfaces
  • 🛖 Creates hiding spots & enrichment
  • 🌍 Mimics natural habitats
• ⚖️ Some enthusiasts argue it’s not strictly essential — plecos can live on prepared diets and veggies.
• 🔬 The truth: more research is needed to fully understand how much nutrition comes from wood vs. the organisms on it.

---

👀 Personal Experience & Observations

• 🪵 Most Panaque species I’ve kept spend the majority of their day on driftwood.
• 🎭 To me, wood gives them enrichment and security while providing a natural grazing area.
• 🐠 Before the “wood digestion debate” became popular, plecos with driftwood in their tanks thrived and lived long lives.

---

✅ Conclusion

Plecos may not “eat wood” in the strict sense, but they clearly benefit from it:

• 🍄 Food source (biofilm, fungus, organisms, and possibly some nutrients from fibers)
• 🛖 Natural enrichment & habitat mimicry
• 💩 Digestive aid (observed in waste coloration and consistency)

👉 Wood may not be mandatory, but it remains one of the best ways to support plecos’ health and natural behavior in the aquarium.

🧪 Experimental Framework

🎯 Objective

To determine whether biofilm accrual (periphyton + microbial + EPS matrix) on aged driftwood drives pleco nutrient intake, visible in feces production and body condition indices.

---

🪵 Step 1: Standardized Wood Coupons

• ✂️ Cut identical wood coupons (e.g., 5×5×1 cm, all same species/age of wood).
• 🔥 Sterilize & pre-soak: bake at 100 °C or soak for tannin leaching.
• 📏 Surface area measurement: foil-wrapping or 3D scan → cm² recorded.
• 🏗 Mount in tanks: use inert holders so fish have full rasping access.
• 🔄 Rotation: maintain A/B sets (while one is sampled, the other grows).

---

🦠 Step 2: Quantifying Biofilm Accrual

• ⚖️ Ash-Free Dry Mass (AFDM)
  • Rinse coupon in tank water (save rinse), scrape surface.
  • Dry at 60 °C → weigh = Dry Mass.
  • Ash at 500–550 °C → weigh again.
  • AFDM = Dry Mass − Ash → mg/cm².
• 🌱 Chlorophyll-a
  • Extract scrapings in 90% acetone, dark + cold.
  • Read with fluorometer or spectrophotometer.
  • µg chl-a/cm² = algal biomass signal.
• 🧴 EPS components
  • Protein (Bradford assay), Carbohydrate (phenol-sulfuric).
  • µg/cm² → nutritional “matrix” value.
• 💡 Optional advanced
  • ATP luminometry (live biomass).
  • Confocal imaging for thickness.
  • DNA/16S for microbial community.

---

💩 Step 3: Measuring Feces Output

• 🐟 Collection methods
  • Use feces settlement cones or isolate fish in a clean tank for 4–6 h.
  • Avoid re-ingestion or detritus mixing.
• ⚖️ Processing
  • Sieve >125 µm, rinse.
  • Dry → weigh → ash = Fecal AFDM.
  • Normalize as g fecal AFDM/kg fish/day.
• 🔬 Characterization
  • Particle size (sieving or laser diffraction).
  • Stable isotopes (δ¹³C, δ¹⁵N) to trace biofilm vs pellet feed origin.
  • DNA metabarcoding of feces to confirm microbial/algal taxa from biofilm.

---

🐠 Step 4: Tracking Body Condition

• 📏 Fulton’s K $K=100\times \frac{W}{L^3}$K=100×L3W where W = weight (g), L = length (cm).
• 📈 Specific Growth Rate (SGR) $SGR=100\times \frac{\ln W_2-\ln W_1}{t}$SGR=100×tlnW2−lnW1
• 🧪 HSI (optional, invasive) $HSI=100\times \frac{W_{\text{liver}}}{W_{\text{body}}}$HSI=100×WbodyWliver
• 📸 Photogrammetry
  • Side-profile images with reference grid → morphometric condition analysis.

---

🌊 Step 5: Environmental Logging

• 🌡 Temperature
• 📊 pH (day/night)
• 🧂 KH/alkalinity
• 💨 DO (dissolved oxygen)
• 💧 Conductivity
• ☀️ PAR (light intensity)
• 🌀 Flow velocity

These parameters affect both biofilm community and pleco grazing behavior.

---

📊 Step 6: Data Analysis

• 🔄 Repeated measures mixed models
  • Fecal_AFDM ~ Biofilm_AFDM_cm2 + FishMass + (1|FishID) + (1|Tank)
  • Condition (K or SGR) ~ mean(Biofilm_AFDM) + mean(Fecal_AFDM)
• 🕒 Lag analysis
  • Test correlations with 0–3 day lags (biofilm growth → feces output).
• 📈 Nonlinear fits (GAMs)
  • Detect plateau/saturation if feces output doesn’t keep rising with biofilm.

---

🔍 Step 7: Interpretation Guide

• ✅ Biofilm ↑ → Feces ↑ + Condition ↑: biofilm is nutritious, assimilated.
• ⚠️ Biofilm ↑ → Feces ↑ but Condition ↔/↓: mostly indigestible bulk.
• 🌱 Correlation stronger with EPS/protein than chl-a: microbial slime > algae.
• 📉 Weak feces signal but better K: efficient digestion of small biofilm amounts.

---

🧰 Practical Kit Checklist

• ⚖️ Analytical balance (0.1 mg)
• 🌡 Drying oven + muffle furnace
• 🧪 Fluorometer or spectrophotometer
• 🧴 Assay kits (Bradford, phenol-sulfuric)
• 🧊 Freezer for samples
• 🧬 Stable isotope service (optional)
• 🪵 Standardized wood coupons + holders
• 🌀 Feces traps or isolation tanks

---

✅ This workflow gives you quantitative, replicable biofilm accrual rates (mg/cm²/day), fecal output (g/kg/day), and condition indices. Correlating them lets you test whether plecos are truly extracting nutrition from biofilm, or just rasping it through.

🪵🔬 Unified Protocol: Xylophagy vs Biofilm Grazing in Panaque

---

1️⃣ Define the Question

Goal: Determine whether Panaque are digesting wood polymers (cellulose/hemicellulose) or mainly ingesting biofilm/EPS/microbes from the wood surface.
To prove true xylophagy, you need 3 lines of evidence:

• 🧪 Enzyme activity (host or microbial cellulases)
• 🧫 Microbiome markers (CAZymes, fermentation)
• 🌿 Assimilation proof (carbon from wood ends up in fish tissues)

---

2️⃣ Prepare the System

• 🪵 Standardized wood coupons (identical species, cut size, surface area measured).
• 🔄 Two conditions:
  • Clean wood (sterilized, biofilm suppressed)
  • Aged wood (biofilm matured naturally)
• 🐟 Experimental groups: Panaque on clean vs aged wood, with/without antibiotics, plus controls (EPS/protein gel panels).
• 📊 Record environment: pH, temp, DO, KH, PAR, flow.

---

3️⃣ Enzyme & Host Evidence (Part A)

• 🧬 Gut assays: stomach → hindgut.
  • Endoglucanase, exoglucanase, β-glucosidase, xylanase.
  • Measure units per mg protein.
• ⚗️ SCFA analysis (acetate, propionate, butyrate) in gut fluid.
• 💊 Antibiotic test: If cellulase/SCFAs drop → microbial origin; if not → host.
• 🧪 Inhibitor panels + heat stability → host vs microbial enzyme profile.
• 🧬 Transcriptomics (RNA-seq): look for host CAZyme expression (GH9, GH45). Presence = endogenous xylophagy.

---

4️⃣ Microbiome Markers (Part B)

• 🔬 16S + metagenomics: quantify cellulase/xylanase/lignin CAZymes, nifH (N-fixation).
• 📈 Metatranscriptomics: confirm active expression on wood diets.
• 🧪 Enrichment cultures: grow gut microbes on cellulose/xylan; test culture supernatants for cellulase activity.
• ⚗️ Fermentation readouts: SCFA concentration & gas profiles. Low SCFA = weak fiber fermentation.

---

5️⃣ Assimilation Proof (Part C)

• 🎯 Stable isotope dual-label test:
  • Feed 13C-labelled cellulose wood (biofilm stripped).
  • Feed 13C-labelled biofilm grown on inert panels.
  • Track 13C in fish muscle/liver over time.
  • Assimilation only from cellulose → xylophagy. Assimilation only from biofilm → biofilm grazing.
• 🪵 Fiber analysis (Van Soest + FTIR): compare cellulose/hemicellulose fractions in ingested wood vs feces.
• 🧪 Biomarkers: pigments (chl-a breakdown), PLFA (microbial fatty acids).
• 🧫 Microscopy of feces: stain cellulose (Calcofluor) vs EPS (ConA); check for diatom frustules, bacterial debris.

---

6️⃣ Exclusion & Controls (Part D)

• 🚫 Clean vs aged wood: fish thrive only with biofilm → grazing; thrive on clean wood → xylophagy.
• 💊 Antibiotics: digestion collapses under antibiotic → microbial mediation.
• 🧴 EPS/protein gels: if these alone sustain fish, EPS (biofilm) is the main nutrition.

---

7️⃣ Decision Matrix (Integration)

---

8️⃣ Suggested 6-Week Workflow

• Weeks 0–2: Acclimation; establish clean vs aged wood tanks.
• Weeks 2–4: Baseline gut assays, SCFAs, microbiome sequencing.
• Weeks 4–5: Antibiotic cross-over, EPS-gel control.
• Weeks 5–6: Dual 13C-label trial + feces/tissue collection, fiber/FTIR, microscopy.
• Final: Integrate all data → matrix → conclusion.

---

🧰 Minimal Toolkit

• Analytical balance, drying oven, muffle furnace
• Enzyme assay reagents (CMCase, β-glucosidase, xylanase)
• GC-FID for SCFAs
• qPCR/metagenomics for CAZymes & nifH
• Stable isotope access (δ¹³C)
• Van Soest fiber analysis, FTIR
• Fluorescent stains (Calcofluor, ConA)
• Microscope, fluorometer/spectrophotometer

---

✅ Summary:
If Panaque show endogenous or microbiome-driven cellulase activity, elevated SCFAs, and tissue assimilation of 13C from cellulose, that’s true xylophagy.
If instead you find low cellulases, low SCFAs, intact cellulose in feces, but isotopic uptake only from biofilm, then they are biofilm grazers using wood mainly as a substrate for microbial food.